You are clearly forgetting that Typhlosion on this thread is a 8 moved lifeorbed specs typhlosion who can sweep entire teams with ease.Ģ52 SpA Choice Specs Typhlosion Eruption (150 BP) vs. The presence of Typhlosion just breaks the tier as a whole.Įdited Novemby Miltank love, what a shame. Does this make Scizor broken too? No, because we've decided in the past that Scizor isn't banworthy. You run the 50/50 of having to build for either Scizor or Typhlosion, which puts you at risk to having your defensive core broke by one or the other. For instance, CB Scizor paired with Typhlosion is hell to deal with. With Typhlosion present, pokemon that were previously top tier threats become broken. I, like most of the people posting here, believe Typhlosion is outright just too offensive for OU and forces changes that are not healthy. Omastar and Kabutops are nice since you can pressure the opponent with Rain Dance if you predict Eruption correctly, but both are easily countered by lord Quagsire and our popular Slowking. If you see a Life Orb user you use Slowking and pray you can paralyze it before you're warn down by physical offense and Absol Pursuit which is becoming more and more popular in OU with Typhlosion present. If you see a Specs user, the best offense is simply sacking something in order to get damage on it to prevent Eruption spam. Typhlosion though, I've seen it dismantle teams with dedicated Special Walls, I've seen it cake walk through offensive teams, and I understand how stupidly centralizing it is. A fully SpDef invested Altaria is great against a non-HP Ice Typhlosion, but how does it fair against the rest of the tier when it is used primarily as a Defensive check to Scizor.Īll in all you know I'm infamous for wanting to keep offensive monsters in our tiers because I am an offensive player and I usually defend these things to the grave. Trapping aside (Scarf Typhlo what?), Omastar and Kabutops fall to one click of HP Grass just like Salamence can remove Forr, Meta, and Skarm with Fire Blast or EQ, maybe even more so since HP Grass is a guaranteed OHKO. For this reason, predictions are more difficult for Typhlosion compared to Salamence. Diglett scarf should also get a special mention since it actually traps and kills Typhlosion which is not something possible with Salamence.Įdit: Salamence gets perfect coverage with only 2 moves whereas Typhlosion need several to get a decent coverage. Altaria special wall can also check a banded Typhlosion. Eruption/Blaze Fire Blast does no dmg to Flash Fire pokemons, is x4 resisted by Omastar and Kabutops and is checked very well by several water types like Azumarill or Lanturn. OU Sturdy pokemons have no way to threathen Salamence which is not the case when we look at Donphan, Steelix and Aggron in UU.ĭclaw is only resisted by Steel types. Eruption and Blaze Fire Blast (which can miss unlike dclaw) are not as accessible as Salamence's Dclaw. Salamence raw power is consistent throughout a duel whereas Typhlosion's raw power is not. Salamence typing and ability allow it to have several switch in opportunities unlike Typhlosion. You are also forgetting about key differences between Salamence and Typhlosion. Typhlosion needs to be Miltank love, what a shame. There is essentially no difference between Typhlosion in UU and Salamence in OU, and thus on the premise of the prior Salamence OU ban, we should move to ban Typhlosion based on merit.Īdd Spikes to the equation along with how easily pressured a special Slowking becomes from physical offense (support), a Typhlosion sweep becomes more and more likely even with just Life Orb Fire Blast. Considering there is only one reliable counter, there is an argument here for centralization which is a factor when considering a ban. The only reliable pokemon to stop Typhlosion is Slowking, a bulky water that has instant recovery. It also has access to Earthquake which can beat its primary "checks" such as Flash Fire pokemon. Typhlosion is being discussed as an offensive uber because it can 2-3 shot the entire UU tier, which includes the majority of its "checks". Considering there is only one reliable counter, there is an argument here for centralization which was a factor to consider for this ban. The only reliable counter to Salamence is Slowbro, a bulky water that has instant recovery. It also has access to Fire Blast + EQ to handle its "checks" in Forretress, Metagross, and Skarmory that can counter this Dragon Claw spam. Salamence is an offensive uber that was banned from OU because CB Dragon Claw spam can 2-3 shot everything in the tier. Can we back track once more and think about this for just one second? Based on OUR prior bans, Typhlosion easily meets criteria for an offensive uber.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |